In a lengthy series of comments way back over here about faith versus science, I wrote the following, which I kind of like:
If there is a God who is transcendent, who is wholly other than what we and the rest of Creation are (see how I snuck that religious word in), then it’s no grudging concession to Enlightenment thinking that we finite human beings can’t apprehend such a being through science or reason alone; it’s a requirement.
Leave a Reply